SUPERVERDADEStatistical fact-checkMercado da Verdade
All fact-checks
Lacks contextVerified on September 9, 2026
The claim under review

“Food prices rose 4x more under the previous government than the current one.”

Correct data, misleading cause: omits the global food cycle

The evidence

The piece compares 13.2% annual food inflation in the earlier window with 3.0% a year in the current one, concluding: “food rose 4x more under Bolsonaro”.

The piece compares 13.2% annual food inflation in the earlier window with 3.0% a year in the current one, concluding: “food rose 4x more under Bolsonaro”.
Excerpt from the original piece, as archived on September 9, 2026. The image is in Portuguese because that is the page under review. See the full page on the Internet Archive ↗
Block 1 · Food inflation

Food got more expensive worldwide — and then eased worldwide.

The site opens with its strongest number: 13.2% annual food inflation in the earlier window against 3.0% a year in the current one. "Four times more expensive." The IPCA figure is correct. The question it does not answer is: four times more expensive because of whom?

The claim

"Food rose 4x more under Bolsonaro."

Food consumed at home, IPCA/IBGE Table 7060, three and a half years of each government. 54.24% against 13.66% cumulative.

The missing context

Three external shocks fit entirely inside the first window.

1. Pandemic and logistics collapse (2020-2021). Shipping costs multiplied, supply chains broke and pent-up demand pushed food prices up worldwide.

2. War in Ukraine (Feb 2022). Russia and Ukraine accounted for about 27% of world wheat exports and more than half of sunflower oil. The FAO global index hit its all-time record in March 2022.

3. Fertilisers. Brazil imports most of what it uses, and Russia and Belarus are central suppliers. Sanctions made the input more expensive — and the input feeds into the price of the following harvest.

+51%
the FAO global food index rose from 95.1 (2019) to 143.7 (2022) — with no Brazilian government at the helm
−15%
and fell back from 143.7 (2022) to 122.0 (2024), the tide the second window rode
133.3
and climbed again: August 2026, the highest level since late 2022
Verdict

Misleading by omission of cause. The gap between the two windows is largely the gap between standing on the climb and standing on the descent of a global commodity cycle. And since the FAO index started rising again in 2026, the very metric used today as proof of competence could become proof of incompetence within months — with nothing having changed in Brasília.

Sources: IBGE/IPCA (Table 7060, food consumed at home); FAO — Food Price Index; FAO/UN releases of March 2022 and September 2026.

Share

This calculation needs to travel.

A bent yardstick travels fast because it is simple. Context travels slowly because it needs explaining. If this check helped you understand the number, it will help someone else too.

WhatsAppPost on X

The text comes pre-filled with the key figure. Write your own if you prefer — the link is the same.